Main Article Content
Aims: 1) To assess the impact of telemedicine on health care services in the primary health center.
2) To determine patient satisfaction and barriers to telemedicine among the study subjects.
Study Design: A cross sectional study.
Place and Duration of Study: Urban Health And Training Centre, Delhi National Capital Region from July 2017 to June 2019
Methodology: All the patients attending telemedicine unit after taking their consent were interviewed using a questionnaire that was designed with questions about patient appointments, perceived advantages, disadvantages and barriers to telemedicine along with telehealth satisfaction questionnaire.
Results: A total of 390 patients were surveyed. There were 157 male and 233 female respondents with the mean age of 36.18 (±11.26) years In all, 72 % of the study subjects had not previously heard of telemedicine. The most common reasons for willingness to use telemedicine were specialist consultation and commonest barrier to use telemedicine was not user friendly software and not in direct contact with doctor. Of those surveyed, only 20% were willing to use telemedicine, 33% would sometimes be willing, 28% were unsure, and 19% were not willing. There was significant relationship between willingness with age and gender
Conclusion: There were constraints in using telemedicine because of software usage and awareness regarding it.
[Cited 2019 Jan]
Available: http://www.who. int/goe/en/
American Telemedicine Association. What is telemedicine?
[Cited 2019 Jan]
Telemedicine. Opportunities and developments in member states.
(Accessed on 17 Dec 2017)
Iyer M, Dev N, Joy JK. Telemedicine in India. Health and Medicine; 2014.
[Last cited on 2017 Jun 03]
Bali S, Gupta A, Khan A, Pakhare A. Evaluation of telemedicine centres in Madhya Pradesh, Central India. J Telemed Telecare. 2016;22(3):183-8.
Epub 2015 Jul 8
Dasgupta A, Deb S. Telemedicine: A new horizon in public health in India. Indian J Community Med. 2008;33:3–8.
Field MJ. Telemedicine: A guide to assessing telecommunications in health care. Committee on Evaluating Clinical Applications of Telemedicine, Division of Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996.
Telemedicine: A Guide to Assessing Telecommunications for Health Care By Institute of Medicine, Committee on Evaluating Clinical Applications of Telemedicine; 1996.
Telehealth Satisfaction Quesstionnare. HTF 402 National First Nations Telehealth Research Project; 2014.
Ghia CJ, Patil AS, Ved JK, Jha RK. Benefits of telemedicine and barriers to its effective implementation in rural India: A multicentric E-survey. Indian Medical Gazette. 2013;145:1–7.
[Last cited on 2018 May 26]
Meher SK, Rath BK, Chaudhry T. Telemedicine - awareness and attitude among rural patients all india institute of medical sciences, Utkal University, New Delhi, India. Ukraine Journal of Telemed. 2009;7:1519.
Steinman M, Morbeck RA, Pires PV, Filho CA, Andrade AHV, Terra JC et al. Impact of telemedicine in hospital culture and its consequences on quality of care and safety. Einstein. 2015;13(4):580-6.
Mohanan M, Giardili S, Das V,Rabin TL, Raj SS, Schwartz JI, et al. Evaluation of a social franchising and telemedicine programme and the care provided for childhood diarrhoea and pneumonia, Bihar, India. Bull World Health Organ. 2017;95: 343–352E
Whitten P, Love B. Patient and provider satisfaction with the use of telemedicine: Overview and rationale for cautious enthusiasm. J Postgrad Med. 2005;51: 294–300.
Rajesh V. Acharya1, Jasuma J. Rai. Evaluation of patient and doctor perception toward the use of telemedicine in Apollo Tele Health Services, India; 2016.
El-Mahalli AA, El-Khafif SH, Al-Qahtani MF. Successes and challenges in the implementation and application of telemedicine in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2012;9:1–27.
Carr-Hill RA. The measurement of patient satisfaction. J Public Health Med. 1992;14:236–49.